Frequently Asked Questions

Compliance & Regulatory Requirements

What are the exclusion screening requirements for home health agencies under the CMS Final Rule?

The CMS Final Rule, effective July 17, 2017, requires home health agencies (HHAs) to ensure that any agencies providing services under arrangement have not been excluded from Medicare, Medicaid, or any other federal health care program. HHAs must also verify that these agencies have not had their billing privileges revoked, and have not been terminated or debarred from participating in any government program. Compliance with these exclusion regulations is now a condition of participation, and CMS has enforcement authority to impose administrative remedies, including termination from the program, for non-compliance. Note: The rule does not provide detailed guidance on how to fulfill state Medicaid exclusion screening requirements. Source

What lists should home health agencies screen to comply with exclusion requirements?

Home health agencies should screen employees, contractors, and vendors against the List of Excluded Individuals and Entities (LEIE) and the System for Award Management (SAM) for Medicare exclusions upon hire and every 30 days thereafter. To address state Medicaid exclusions, agencies are advised to screen against all 41 state exclusion lists in addition to federal lists. Note: There is no universal list of all Medicaid excluded entities, and CMS has not provided clear guidance on fulfilling this requirement. Source

What are the consequences for failing to meet exclusion screening requirements?

CMS can impose a range of administrative remedies for failing to meet exclusion screening requirements, including termination from participation in Medicare and Medicaid programs. These consequences are independent from the OIG’s enforcement authorities for exclusion violations. Note: Detailed limitations on enforcement actions are not publicly documented; ask sales for specifics. Source

Is self-certification sufficient for exclusion screening compliance?

CMS has stated that self-certification is an appropriate mechanism for identifying denial of Medicare or Medicaid enrollment or verifying debarment from government programs. However, HHAs will still be held responsible for failing to properly screen contracted entities providing services under arrangement. Relying solely on self-certification or screening only federal exclusion lists may not be sufficient to meet all compliance requirements. Note: Agencies are advised to employ a broad exclusion screening protocol. Source

Features & Capabilities

What services does Exclusion Screening offer to help home health agencies comply with exclusion screening requirements?

Exclusion Screening provides comprehensive exclusion screening and verification services, including employee screening, vendor and contractor screening, and a compliance hotline. The proprietary SAFER™ software automates the screening process, offers daily updates, advanced algorithms to handle inconsistent data formats and duplicate names, and scales to organizations of all sizes. Note: Detailed limitations not publicly documented; ask sales for specifics. Source

How does Exclusion Screening's SAFER™ software improve compliance for home health agencies?

The SAFER™ software automates exclusion screening, updates compliance data daily, and uses advanced algorithms to reduce false positives and negatives. It adapts to organizations of all sizes and eliminates manual effort, helping agencies maintain compliance with federal and state regulations. Note: Best fit for organizations seeking automated compliance; teams needing custom integrations may want to confirm compatibility. Source

Implementation & Support

How quickly can a home health agency implement Exclusion Screening's services?

New clients can begin screening within 1 day, which is faster than many other vendors. The SAFER™ software is designed for easy integration, and dedicated compliance specialists provide support for a smooth setup. Note: Implementation speed may vary for highly customized requirements. Source

What kind of support does Exclusion Screening provide during implementation?

Exclusion Screening offers dedicated support from compliance specialists to ensure a smooth and hassle-free setup. The team assists with integration, onboarding, and ongoing compliance management. Note: For highly technical integrations, additional support may be required. Source

Pricing & Plans

How is Exclusion Screening's pricing determined for home health agencies?

Exclusion Screening's pricing is competitive and customized based on the specific monitoring lists required and the volume of screenings needed. This tailored approach ensures agencies only pay for what they need, making the service cost-effective and scalable. To receive a personalized quote, fill out the form on the contact page. Note: Exact pricing details are not publicly documented; request a quote for specifics. Source

Use Cases & Benefits

What are the main benefits for home health agencies using Exclusion Screening?

Home health agencies benefit from improved compliance, reduced risk of non-compliance penalties, cost savings through automation, operational efficiency, and enhanced integrity via secure fraud reporting channels. The services are scalable for both small practices and large healthcare systems. Note: Best fit for agencies prioritizing compliance automation; those needing highly customized workflows should confirm fit. Source

What pain points does Exclusion Screening address for home health agencies?

Exclusion Screening addresses the complexity of compliance, manual screening challenges, regulatory risks, fraud detection and reporting, cost-effectiveness, legal risks and penalties, and time/resource management. Automation and advanced algorithms reduce manual effort and compliance risks. Note: Agencies with unique compliance needs may require additional customization. Source

Legal & State-Specific Guidance

What is the legal basis for Medicaid exclusion screening in Washington State?

The legal requirements for provider participation and exclusion screening for Washington State Medicaid are outlined in the Washington Administrative Code (WAC). Providers must follow these authoritative rules to maintain compliance. Note: For other states, consult the relevant administrative code or contact Exclusion Screening for guidance. Source

Customer Proof & Case Studies

Are there any case studies demonstrating the impact of exclusion screening?

Yes, Exclusion Screening provides a case study focused on the laboratory services industry. The study discusses a Texas-based laboratory services company involved in submitting false claims and highlights the importance of thorough exclusion screening. Read the full case study here: OIG Exclusion Case Study: The Impact of a False Claims Act Judgment. Note: Additional case studies for other industries are not publicly documented; contact Exclusion Screening for more information. Source

New Report Screening Failures & Their Financial Fallout — $26M in penalties and how to avoid them. Download the report →

Home Health Final Rule Extends Exclusion Screening Obligation: Failure to Screen Could Result in Termination from Medicare

By Paul Weidenfeld

The new Final Rule issued by CMS revising the conditions of participation for home health agencies (HHAs) requires that providers “must ensure” that agencies providing services under arrangement have not been excluded from Medicare, Medicaid or any other federal health care program.  Effective July 17, 2017, the rule also states that providers must ensure that such agencies have not had their billing privileges revoked, and that they have not been terminated or been debarred from participating in any government program.  In making these requirements a condition of participation, CMS has created an affirmative screening obligation under which they have enforcement authority.

I. Compliance as a Condition of Participation

By making compliance with exclusion regulations a condition of participation, CMS has raised the stakes for failing to properly screen the exclusion status of vendors or contractors for HHAs while reaffirming the agency’s longstanding concerns about the participation of excluded persons in the Medicare Program.   Specifically, CMS has a wide assortment of administrative remedies that can be imposed for failing to meet conditions of participation – including even the ability to terminate a provider from participation in the program itself – all of which are independent from the OIG’s enforcement authorities for exclusion violations.

II. Guidance that Doesn’t Guide

Under the Final Rule, CMS may now hold an HHA liable for a State Exclusion in addition to a Federal Exclusion, by including Medicaid exclusion screening as a condition of participation.  However, as there is no universal list of all Medicaid excluded entities and individuals and the newly published final rule provides no guidance on how this requirement can be met, CMS has created an affirmative obligation without any guidance on how to fulfill it.  
In the response to a commenter’s concerns about the difficulties involved in meeting these requirements CMS stated that it “appreciates the opportunity to clarify [the] requirement” but it did not actually speak to the State issue.  The agency discussed the Federal exclusion lists but failed to address how an HHA could screen for a Medicaid exclusion.  It provided that self-certification is an appropriate mechanism in identifying denial of Medicare or Medicaid enrollment or in verifying debarment from government programs, but maintained that an HHA will still be held responsible for failing to properly screen a contracted entity that is providing “services under arrangement”.  This lack of guidance in screening requirements could be potentially problematic for a home health agency that relies solely on self-certification or just screening the Federal exclusion lists to weed out excluded entities. 

III. Conclusion

We think it is clear at this point that the mandated screening requirements consist of checking the List of Excluded Individuals and Entities (LEIE) and the System for Award Management (SAM) for a Medicare exclusion upon hire and every 30 days thereafter.  However, since the final rule does not clearly articulate what agencies must do to meet these requirements – particularly insofar as they involve Exclusions imposed by State and their Medicaid Fraud Control Units – home health agencies are left without clear guidance as to how to meet this requirement and are well advised to employ a broad exclusion screening protocol.The best way to remain in compliance and avoid a Medicare or Medicaid Exclusion is to screen all employees, contractors, and vendors every month against all 41 state lists in addition to the LEIE and SAM.  

Are you taking the necessary precautions to ensure you are not working with an excluded entity? We know it can be difficult to screen every Federal and State exclusion list. Call Exclusion Screening at 1-800-294-0952 or fill out the form below to hear about our cost-effective solution and for a free quote and assessment of your needs.

Paul Weidenfeld is a nationally recognized expert in health care fraud litigation and the Federal False Claims Act.  A former Department of Justice National Health Care Fraud Coordinator, he is currently in private representing health care providers and individuals, and a co-founder of Exclusion Screening, LLC.

Related Resources

Exclusion Screening

Screen employees and providers against over 42 federal and state exclusion databases.

Learn more →

Glossary

Definitions of key healthcare compliance terms like OIG, LEIE, and SAM.

Browse glossary →

FAQ

Answers to the most common questions about exclusion screening.

Read FAQ →

Talk to a screening specialist — book your free consultation now

Schedule a Free Consultation

Talk with exclusion screening experts

  • OIG, SAM & state exclusion lists
  • Compliance gap analysis
  • Custom screening solutions
Book Your Free Consultation

Discover more from Exclusion Screening

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading